Call for Reviewers

ICEAST 2027 invites distinguished researchers, academicians, and industry professionals to contribute as reviewers. Your expertise will ensure the quality, integrity, and global impact of the conference proceedings.

Apply to Become a Reviewer Reviewer Guidelines

Who Can Apply

Reviewer Eligibility Criteria

Academic Qualifications

Hold a PhD degree in a relevant discipline; or
Be currently pursuing a PhD with demonstrated research experience; or
Hold a Master's degree with significant professional and research experience with more than 12 years of professional experience.

Research Experience

Authored or co-authored peer-reviewed journal or conference publications.
Demonstrated expertise in one or more conference topics.
Experience in reviewing manuscripts for journals or conferences is desirable.

Professional Experience

Academic staff members at recognized higher education institutions.
Researchers from research centers or laboratories.
Experienced professionals from industry, government, defense, or professional organizations with relevant technical expertise.

Your Role

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

Evaluate assigned manuscripts objectively and fairly.
Assess submissions for originality, technical quality, significance, and relevance.
Provide constructive comments to help authors improve their work.
Submit reviews within the stipulated deadlines.
Maintain the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts.
Declare any conflict of interest before accepting a review assignment.
Adhere to the ethical standards of the conference and publishing partners.

Recognition

Reviewer Benefits

Selected reviewers will receive:

Official Certificate of Appreciation from ICEAST 2027.
Recognition on the conference website (subject to consent).
Opportunity to contribute to an international academic event.
Professional networking opportunities with researchers and experts worldwide.
Consideration for future Technical Program Committees and Editorial Roles.
Priority consideration for serving as Track Chairs and Session Chairs in future editions.

Expertise

Review Areas

Applicants are encouraged to indicate their expertise areas based on the conference tracks, including:

Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Systems
Systems Engineering
Electronics and Communications
Sustainable Energy
Cybersecurity
Advanced Manufacturing
Aeronautical Engineering
Unmanned Aerial Systems
Marine Engineering
Naval Architecture
Digital Education
English Language Learning
Physics
Mathematics
Sustainable Construction
Geomatics
Smart Cities
Infrastructure Engineering
Other specialized areas

Standards

Reviewer Guidelines

Strict Policy: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) for generating or modifying review content is strictly prohibited.

Core Ethical Principles

Maintain strict confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
Ensure impartial and unbiased evaluation
Provide scientifically rigorous and evidence-based feedback
Adhere to professional and ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must decline assignments if there is any conflict of interest, including:

Same institution or recent collaboration
Personal or professional relationships
Financial or competitive conflicts

Review Process

Double-blind peer review system
Evaluation based solely on technical merit

Evaluation Criteria

Originality and novelty
Technical correctness and depth
Experimental validation and results
Clarity of presentation
Relevance to conference themes

Final Recommendation Categories

Accept
Borderline
Reject

Reviewer Application

The Organising Committee invites qualified academics, researchers, practitioners, and subject specialists to apply as paper reviewers. Reviewer selection will be based on qualifications, research and reviewing experience, areas of expertise, publication record, and alignment with the conference tracks.

Start Your Application